---
title: "> I dunno - maybe bc the woman will ACTUALLY love, instead of just..."
date: 2023-12-07
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYMhGNel0VPMbKxjopPDcL_fqsjTHXtaqkfixgvuuBmvv7jg_Y2kNoamWK9ZYcGlcVSKHD2T2wLZ2xRgr7iya2Uc9peNyFvm9OcWTixz_vh-l22wzCgqkxLjMPlrvA6f6K7MSIlhjQL7JwFddIJRFYY6FPhMCfbHsWflBbEVs3mMLVQ3mx_-Kq7xZWZkSuTbix_zbJBLd2fJ&s=519"
---

# > I dunno - maybe bc the woman will ACTUALLY love, instead of just...

*December 7, 2023 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment.*

> I dunno - maybe bc the woman will ACTUALLY love, instead of just being programmed to provide a facsimile of that? Again, it's biochauvinism to suggest to that synths will be any less capable of love: https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/23779067/artificial-intelligence-ai-her-movies-ex-machina-2001-blade-runner-robots And what is "actual" love?   "Love" is just a genetic program to bond a couple long enough that they can successfully raise offspring to adulthood and reproduce themselves.   It seems to me that synths  will be able to run such programs just as well or better than biowomen in the not-too-distant future.